Remember when all the bees were dying? When we were headed for, as Time magazine put it in a cover story in 2013, “A World Without Bees”?
I do remember that, so I was pleasantly surprised to see this headline earlier this month: “Bees Are Bouncing Back From Colony Collapse Disorder.”
The bees got better! Great! Now we can all find some other looming environmental disaster to freak out about.
The rest of the article by Bloomberg’s Alan Bjerga didn’t entirely support that assessment, though. Yes, a U.S. Department of Agriculture survey had found that the number of commercial honeybee colonies was up over last year and that the percentage of colonies lost was down. But then there was a beekeeper telling Bjerga that his bee colonies were a lot weaker than they used to be, and an entomologist saying that while colony collapse disorder was “a blip in the history of beekeeping,” that’s because it’s been “vastly overshadowed by diseases, recognizable parasites and diagnosable physiological problems.”
So that made me curious. Now, after a couple of days of study, I can report that:
- Yeah, maybe the honeybees are doing a little better, but not much.
- Colony collapse disorder, narrowly defined, was never the main problem.
- Honeybees were never on the brink of extinction.
- Some native bee species in the U.S. (honeybees are European imports) and elsewhere might be on the brink of extinction.
- The commercial beekeeping industry in the U.S. is fascinating, weird, complicated, remarkable, crazy (choose your adjective).
Colony collapse disorder entered the lexicon in the winter of 2006-2007, when beekeepers began finding hives abandoned by their apian inhabitants but showing no other signs of distress. Here’s how David Wallace-Wells described it in New York magazine a couple of years ago:
The bees had just disappeared. In the U.K., they called it Mary Celeste syndrome, after the merchant ship discovered off the…